The last human in the loop is a signature
Most automation programmes stop at the same place, and it is not a technical boundary. Somebody has to be accountable, and accountability needs a person.
- automation
- accountability
- approval
Notes from a research programme on the autonomous enterprise: why the last human in the loop is a signature, and what stops a machine owning anything.
Most automation programmes stop at the same place, and it is not a technical boundary. Somebody has to be accountable, and accountability needs a person.
Bolting recovery onto a system that was designed to be repaired by people produces automation that fails in more interesting ways, not fewer.
Legal personhood for autonomous systems gets discussed as though it were arriving. It is not, and the reasons are more interesting than the proposals.
The interesting property of a stop is not that it exists. It is that the thing being stopped has no path to observe, delay or depend on it.
Biological language is useful for describing closed loops and self-repair, and it is the fastest route to claims nobody can support. Both are worth saying.